Saturday, 7 January 2017

REVIEW: The Long Earth

13147230

Everyone loves Sir Terry. I love Sir Terry. I love the books & have great respect for the man. This review is simply my opinion of the success of this particular collaboration. I'll be 1st in line for the next T.P book and I'd even give T.P + S.B another go. 

From the slew of 4 & 5* reviews already on show I may be out on a limb on this one - so don't listen to me - give it a try.


-------------

Collaboration. It’s a word with an unfortunate aftertaste. Collaborators get a bad rap. Sir Terry Pratchett’s collaborations with other notable authors have been limited. In 1990 we saw Good Omens, produced with Neil Gaiman. On the crest of that success Pratchett found another partner in Larry Niven but this effort floundered with Niven producing Rainbow Mars in 1999 as a solo work built upon some of their shared ideas. And now 2012 sees The Long Earth, a collaboration with Stephen Baxter. The accompanying promotion contains a photo of the two grandees locked in combat before a laden bookshelf. A certain degree of dynamic tension does help in collaborative writing, too little and you get compromise writing, too much and it’s never going to get finished. I think here both men were pulling punches and the pages could have benefited from a good blooding!

Collaborations can be port and stilton good, or marmite and custard bad. I suspect it’s impossible for two fine writers like Baxter and Pratchett to serve up anything wholly unpalatable, but the Long Earth feels long, although it is short, and is decidedly blah. Think porridge.

The Long Earth is science fiction. In science fiction the IDEA tends to overshadow the characters and even the story. Here the IDEA has flattened both. Glimpses of story and character may be seen poking out from the margins of the IDEA, vital juices pooling. You can’t see much but you can see enough to know you don’t need an ambulance.

The Terry Pratchett of Discworld fame has not shown up to this party. There’s rarely a smile in The Long Earth, and never a laugh. The idea explored is that Earth sits in one of an infinity of parallel universes and that these become opened up to humanity such that pretty much everyone can step through them like moving from one card to the next in a deck of cards. We get to hear a lot about the impact this has on humanity, both social and economic. Sometimes we hear this from characters who pop up and are not heard of again, giving the book a disjointed feel. Of the hundreds of thousands of Earths open to Joe Public almost all are Earth as it would have been without us. A lot of time is spent detailing minor evolutionary variations in the flora and fauna, to the point where you just don’t care about one more slightly smaller elephant or slightly uglier crocodile. A lot of time is spent hopping from one forest world to the next. It’s an idea that is interesting in a paragraph but becomes increasingly dull over 300 pages.

The writing, line by line, is fine. It lacks trade-mark Pratchett sharpness but it does the job. The story arching over chapters is . . . not gripping. There’s essentially no tension in it. Our heroes (a young man who is very good at moving through the worlds, and an artificial intelligence named Lobsang) are exploring, they don’t have any clear goals stated, nothing is after them, they have no serious problems, they don’t appear worried or even to care that much, and thus as a reader one tends to a similar disposition.

The book ends with a bang, but it’s a rather ineffectual one that is, like the bulk of the book, hard to care about. I’m a fan of Sir Terry’s work and I applaud his willingness to experiment with new styles and new writing partners. I hope he keeps doing it. I cannot though, hand on heart say I enjoyed this book. Not even a little.  


Edit: RIP Sir Terry - you left us many great books to remember you by.


You can go and 'like' my review on goodreads, if you like.

Friday, 6 January 2017

Personality

Here's an exercise for you.

Take a handful of main characters from your recent fantasy reads and think hard about how you would describe their personality.

For many of my favourite books I could wax lyrical about the main characters, but for many popular works of fantasy (some of which I enjoyed) I find that there is less to say.

The fact is that the genre loves a generican hero. For many main characters what we remember is what they did, not who they were. Our list of things to say about their character is often:

i) Brave/plucky
ii) Tries to do the right thing.

Writers like George RR Martin and Robin Hobb give us real people with deep and believable personalities. Others (and I'm not saying the books are bad) give us a two-legged vehicle designed to exercise the plot and into whose shoes we can imagine ourselves.

 And of course the danger in writing strong characters with clearly defined personality traits and personal histories that steer their course is that the reader finds themself reading about the character rather than seeing the world through their eyes and sharing their experiences on a deeper level. But that's the catch 22. If the character is a blank ... whose experiences are you sharing ... and what's deep about it?

The art is to write real and uniquely interesting characters but to bring to the fore enough of their common humanity that the reader can bond with them, care about them, laugh, suffer, and fear with them. And that's a hard art to master.





Wednesday, 4 January 2017

Go on, do it again!

Releasing a new book is a nervy business. Will it be loved or loathed? Or worse, ignored...

When it's a first book the set of worries are somewhat different. Will anyone care? Will you be able to make a living at this? Will the people who have gambled on you make their money back?

Once you've had a successful book there are new worries. What will my readers think of this one? The more successful the first book/s the brighter that spotlight, the more palpable the tension.


I have been lucky enough to have had my trilogies written before the first book hit the shelves. This has meant I haven't ever been in the position of writing the next book while readers react to the first, or while they look my way and start tapping their feet and checking their watches.

When Red Sister comes out in April I won't have anyone who has been waiting for it for years or who has strong opinions about what will or should happen between the two covers. I won't have to write Grey Sister while the internet forums reverberate with whispers and then howls of "Hurry up!"


So I have considerable sympathy for the incredibly successful authors of two books that are high on my "waiting for" list.

Sure, they have their millions of dollars and their legions of adoring fans to console them and they don't really need my sympathy, but I know what I would be feeling in their place.

Writing is a private business. You do it in your own head. It drops from your brain into a file via the  medium of a keyboard. Sure, after you finish you share it and then you would like people to read it in their thousands. But you don't want them standing at your shoulder when you type.

More than that though ... if you do something special ... in writing terms a book that captures the imagination of millions ... on a small scale it's like shooting a basket ball through the hoop from the  centre line ... and an audience gathers ... "Do it again!" they say. Suddenly it's a lot harder.

George RR Martin and Patrick Rothfuss have both written books that have set them squarely in the spotlight's glare. A vast number of people *love* what they have written so far. The story that each has crafted has become part of popular culture. They have almost inadvertently taken on the responsibility for satisfying the demands of their readers' imaginations, and they're now having to do it with everyone "watching".

If you look at the ire which some fans hurl their way for the length of the wait for the next book it makes you wonder what their outcry might be if when the book does eventually show it fails to satisfy. If the characters take different paths from those the readers want or expect...

I guess JK Rowling experienced the same thing, but her readers were not (in the main) grownups with loud internet-driven voices. She didn't meet them en masse at conventions or in the spaces were she hung out.

And as the wait stretches out it seems it must ratchet up the tension in every aspect of this reader-author relationship. It increases the numbers waiting, the expectation, the impatience, the intensity.

It bears remembering that Martin and Rothfuss haven't published books (in the series that get all the focus) for longer than I've been in print. It's been a fair chunk of both their lives since they have had to offer up for re-inspection the characters to which they are tied in the public mind. Long enough for a man and woman to meet, fall in love, conceive a child, birth that child, have another, and another, send the first to school, then the second...

If it were me, and I had a story out there that was held in such high regard and whose next installment was so eagerly anticipated, and for which I would be so publicly held to account ... I think I'd be terrified, honestly. Writing brings many rewards but in such circumstances I think I would be tormented by a, perhaps misplaced, sense of responsibility and guilt. Another part of me would want to buy a yacht, sail off, and forget it all.


I have absolutely no insight into the particular circumstances or challenges either author is facing. I know every writer has a different experience. I've loved their work so far and I'm resolved to wait without complaint for the next installment. There are many fine authors to keep me entertained in the mean time. All I can say is that while I envy their success I also know that I don't envy the pressure I would feel in their shoes.

Even putting Red Sister onto the shelves is making me nervous and I hope I'm never in the position of having to write when people are waiting on me to finish.








Monday, 26 December 2016

REVIEW: Watchmen

781206

I didn't read this until last year. I saw the film about six months later. I'm a new convert still radiant with that 'just converted' glow. 

Along with the Sandman graphic novels this is my favourite work in the medium (Zenith and Preacher get honourable mentions). Watchmen wins over all of the other candidates in ambition. This is a work of vast ambition. It doesn't deliver on every level, it isn't perfect, but it contains so much that succeeds, and comes so close to fulfilling its promises that it would be churlish to mention any failings.

Alan Moore is a great writer. He's not a great writer for comics, he's a great writer period, who happens to have made the graphic novel his medium. Watchmen is at times literary, funny, erudite, tragic, exciting, intriguing... it's written for intelligent grown-up readers. 

The plot sprawls, it's convoluted, it spans generations and a large cast. What keeps it together are the deeply personal stories on various scales. Its scope was what kept it from the big screen for so long, and in truth the movie (whilst good fun and well done, I thought) is just a 2D projection of this complex multi-dimensional work. That same complexity is stopping me from doing it justice in this short review. Rather than try I'm just going to back off the grandiose praise and return to the punchline:

This is a fun read. It's exciting. The artwork ROCKS. It's as deep as that hole Alice fell down, but you never notice you're falling. Pick it up. Read it with pride. If someone sneers at you for reading a comic-book... hit them with it. It's nice and fat!


You can go and 'like' my review on goodreads, if you like.

Friday, 23 December 2016

My reading in 2016

Some book bloggers can devour four books a week. I struggle to read a book a month, though this year I have done significantly better than the last two.


Since my post this time last year I've managed to read 16 books (I'm on my 17th & 18th).

I also read out loud 6 children's books to my daughter, Celyn (at the bottom of the list). This is a significant drop but Celyn's choice of entertainment does vary and has included endless repetition of Malory Towers audiobooks this year...

As is my wont I have reviewed all of these books on Goodreads and you can reach those reviews by clicking on the covers. Listed in chronological order of reading.

Some great reads this year but of all of these I have to say Senlin Ascends was my best read, one of my favourite books of all time in fact. So read it. Nod was the most literary and also a very good book. The Girl With All The Gifts wasn't fantasy, but it was excellent. Many of these titles got 5* from me.

Finding a self-published book that ranks among my best reads ever was a real pay-off from the SPFBO. Many successful authors (and many who are successful in other fields) suffer from impostor syndrome, and to some extent I had a sense of it before I was published. Prince of Thorns sat for years on my hard drive as I felt sure that even if it was of sufficient quality the chances of getting it through the lottery of agents and publishers were slim.

Then I tried to get published and met with almost instant success. But even though I had seen the system "work" I still couldn't help feel that there had been a lot of luck involved. So, I set up the Self-Published Fantasy Blog-Off to try to offset all that to a small degree and give other authors another ticket in the lottery.

The fact that a book as fine as Senlin Ascends floundered for years despite the author's best efforts seems to me confirmation of all my instincts. Quality on its own is no guarantee of success. In fact it may be that it only gives a modest edge and that the true struggle is reaching a critical mass of readers.

Click on the text to get my Goodreads review for each book.

179744

28660

23559647

64394

23014712

18520619

25972177

17235026

18947303
17554595

24486799

25159315

25328893

16044493


23157777

Currently reading something brand new and something thirty years old.
29936142498214


Books I read to Celyn (12)

23002906

2213661

2120932

1852

25784663

3


To Be Read

In 2015 I read 12 books. In 2014 about the same.

This is a pile of books that have been sent or given to me recently. Some from previous years have fallen off the stack unread as I realize that I will never get to them.

(click photo for detail)

It has 13 books in it!

And, of course, I don't want or intend my whole reading year to be decided by obligation. I will read books that I've heard a lot about, that friends or family recommend, or that just plain grab my attention for whatever reason. I will also re-read some old favourites.

All of which is to say that even these books stand a good chance of not being read by me despite my best intentions.

This post exists for two reasons. Firstly, general interest. Secondly, so I can point in its direction the next person who wants to send me their latest book.

I wish I was one of those people who can read a hundred books a year. But I'm not.






Thursday, 22 December 2016

Sex! ...again...

In response to the wall of text on my Facebook page by someone unhappy with this poll (among their postings we touch on FGM and planned parenthood rights) I am happy to acknowledge that the "other" option should read "other answer" thereby not ruling out "none".


Anyway, I ran this POLL to find out about my readers. I show the result at this point before mentioning it on reddit and possibly "corrupting" the statistics with votes from a particularly male-heavy population.


I ran a similar poll in 2013 which had 599 replies (and was aired on reddit). That showed I had at that time a 72% male, 28% female readership. I hope to get some reddit votes on this current poll to see what kind of effect it has and maybe see if that earlier poll was significantly skewed by it.

But anyway, the bottom line seems to be that I now have almost as many female readers as I do male readers and have been moving toward an equal distribution over the years. Perhaps The Red Queen's War trilogy has played a role here, or simply that word has spread from an initially male-heavy base into the wider population.

Perhaps Red Sister will continue the trend. I hope so, as I think any writer would like to think that whether or not someone enjoys their book doesn't depend on something that can be captured in so simple a poll.